A Social Disconnect
The American Dream is a simple one: with hard work, good sense, and determination, anyone can get ahead. During a time when unskilled labor could yield a decent living, this was probably true.
It’s not true now. A 2005 Wall Street Journal special series on social mobility crunched the numbers: 45 – 60 percent of your income potential is determined by what your parents make. The conclusion? If even your grandparents weren’t poor in their day, you are far less likely to be poor tomorrow. 9
Poverty is an intergenerational affair.
Why does it work this way? There are a variety of factors – and one of the chief ones is social capital. Those whose families are only recently poor still have access to important social networks, a strong sense of the requisite skills to pull oneself out of poverty, and even the aspirations for a better life. Those whose families have been poor for generations – especially those locked in an area of concentrated poverty – have no way of connecting with the wider world.
“With strong social connections, people are able to get jobs, obtain resources in time of crisis, share childcare, ensure children’s safety, borrow money and have an increased chance of voice or influence, and thus are able to prevent some of the most damaging effects of poverty and help the next generation escape from it,” noted a 2003 article in the journal World Development. “It is vital that such positive connections are not eroded.”10
When they do erode, poverty often becomes entrenched for generations.
- Data provided by Education Week
- Based on 2000 Census Data compiled by the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy
- Compiled from the 2005 Census update
- The Concentration of Negative Child Outcomes in Low-Income Neighborhoods; Mark Mather and Kerri L. Rivers; The Annie E. Casey Foundation Population Reference Bureau, February 2006
- Compiled from the 2005 Census update
- Serving Low-income Families in Poverty Neighborhoods; Using Promising Programs and Practices: Building a Foundation for Redesigning Public and Nonprofit Social Services; Bay Area Social Services Coalition
- The Environment of Childhood Poverty; American Psychologist; Volume 59(2), February/March 2004, p 77-92
- Concentrated Poverty vs. Concentrated Affluence: Effects on Neighborhood Social Environments and Children's Outcomes; Anne R. Pebley and Narayan Sastry; RAND; May, 2003
- As rich-poor gap widens in U.S., class mobility stalls; David Wessel; Wall Street Journal, Friday, May 13, 2005
- Enduring Poverty and the Conditions of Childhood: Lifecourse and Intergenerational Poverty Transmissions; Caroline Harper, Rachel Marcus, Karen Moore; World Development Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 535–554, 2003
- The Intergenerational Transfer of Psychosocial Risk; Mediators, Vulnerability and Resilience; Lisa A. Serbin and Jennifer Karp; Annual Revue of Psychology, 55:333-63, 2004
- The Environment of Childhood Poverty; American Psychologist; Volume 59(2), February/March 2004, p 77-92
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Enduring Poverty and the Conditions of Childhood: Lifecourse and Intergenerational Poverty Transmissions; Caroline Harper, Rachel Marcus, Karen Moore; World Development Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 535–554, 2003
