Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Bay Area En EspañolContact UsHome

 

The Need for Mentoring in the Bay Area
Mentoring is the Answer — continued

 

In the Bay Area, 72 neighborhoods of concentrated poverty generate the majority of violent crime, gang activity, school dropouts, and other social pathologies. Tens of thousands of children living below the poverty lines are clustered together in socially toxic environments – “urban war zones,” as Garbarino notes.

Typically, these children are left to their own devices because society’s interventions are either:

  • Ineffective, because they don’t address children’s need for social capital or;
  • Too expensive, and no one is willing to pay for it.

 

Mentoring, however, is both effective and affordable:  indeed, mentoring works best when mentors are community volunteers – provided they’re properly trained and supported.  At-risk children don’t need another “official” presence in their lives trying to “fix” them – they need responsible friends they can connect with.  That presence, a caring human being they can form a genuine connection with, makes the intervention far more effective.  Volunteer mentors provide that at very little cost.

They can also be provided for free to the children and families involved, making the process available to the families that need it most.

 

Footnotes
  1. Data provided by Education Week
  2. Based on 2000 Census Data compiled by the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy
  3. Compiled from the 2005 Census update
  4. The Concentration of Negative Child Outcomes in Low-Income Neighborhoods; Mark Mather and Kerri L. Rivers; The Annie E. Casey Foundation Population Reference Bureau, February 2006
  5. Compiled from the 2005 Census update
  6. Serving Low-income Families in Poverty Neighborhoods; Using Promising Programs and Practices: Building a Foundation for Redesigning Public and Nonprofit Social Services; Bay Area Social Services Coalition
  7. The Environment of Childhood Poverty; American Psychologist; Volume 59(2), February/March 2004, p 77-92
  8. Concentrated Poverty vs. Concentrated Affluence: Effects on Neighborhood Social Environments and Children's Outcomes; Anne R. Pebley and Narayan Sastry; RAND; May, 2003
  9. As rich-poor gap widens in U.S., class mobility stalls; David Wessel; Wall Street Journal, Friday, May 13, 2005
  10. Enduring Poverty and the Conditions of Childhood: Lifecourse and Intergenerational Poverty Transmissions; Caroline Harper, Rachel Marcus, Karen Moore; World Development Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 535–554, 2003
  11. The Intergenerational Transfer of Psychosocial Risk; Mediators, Vulnerability and Resilience; Lisa A. Serbin and Jennifer Karp; Annual Revue of Psychology, 55:333-63, 2004
  12. The Environment of Childhood Poverty; American Psychologist; Volume 59(2), February/March 2004, p 77-92
  13. Ibid
  14. Ibid
  15. Ibid
  16. Ibid
  17. Ibid
  18. Enduring Poverty and the Conditions of Childhood: Lifecourse and Intergenerational Poverty Transmissions; Caroline Harper, Rachel Marcus, Karen Moore; World Development Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 535–554, 2003